Federal Institute for Population Research

Peer-Reviewed Articles in Scientific JournalsIs the migrant share really the problem? Size of migrant population and individual authoritarianism as major determinants of xenophobic attitudes

Heller, Ayline; Braunheim, Lisa; Decker, Oliver; Brähler, Elmar; Schmidt, Peter (2023)

Ethnic and Racial Studies 47(15): 3161–3187

DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2023.2276221

Contact hypothesis and threat hypothesis are among the most influential theories of xenophobia. The former proposes that intergroup contact may reduce prejudice. The latter suggests that a large outgroup may increase xenophobic attitudes.

Using data of a 2018 German representative sample (N = 2,016), we employed multilevel analyses. As predictors, we looked at outgroup size, gross domestic product, and unemployment rate on a county level. On the individual level, we included authoritarianism and a wide range of sociodemographic variables.

Individual authoritarianism was identified as the strongest predictor of xenophobic attitudes. On the county level, a higher proportion of migrants was associated with lower values of xenophobia. This serves as an indicator for contact hypothesis. Our results suggest that contextualizing social psychological and micro-sociological theories and employing multilevel analyses are valuable tools to detangle the interplay of individual and contextual influences on xenophobic attitudes.